Subscribe to our newsletters
Understanding Mandatory Retirement
Mandatory retirement is a widely misunderstood concept in Ontario. Many people assume that retirement at age 65 is automatic or required by law. It is not. In Ontario, mandatory retirement is generally prohibited under the Ontario Human Rights Code unless a narrow legal exception applies.
Facing forced retirement or age-related pressure at work?
Being pushed to retire because of your age may be a violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code. Get legal advice before making any decisions.
Call: 1-800-771-7882 Speak to a Human Rights LawyerWhat is mandatory retirement?
Mandatory retirement refers to a policy requiring a person to retire at a specified age, typically 65. In Ontario, age-based termination of employment is generally treated as discrimination. The presumption under the Ontario Human Rights Code is that such policies are unlawful unless a recognized exception can be established.
The legal framework in Ontario
In 2006, Ontario eliminated the upper age limit of 65 from the definition of "age" in the Ontario Human Rights Code. This change made age-based retirement policies presumptively discriminatory. Retirement cannot be enforced based on age alone. Any policy that requires a person to leave employment at a fixed age must meet a strict legal test to be lawful.
The bona fide occupational requirement test
A mandatory retirement policy may be upheld only if it can be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR). This is a high legal threshold. To meet the test, the retirement policy must satisfy three criteria.
The three-part BFOR test
- The policy must be rationally connected to the performance of the job
- It must have been adopted in good faith, in the honest belief that it was necessary
- It must be reasonably necessary to accomplish a legitimate work-related purpose, and it must be impossible to accommodate the individual without undue hardship
In practice, the BFOR test is met only in limited occupations where there is a demonstrable connection between age and the ability to perform safety-critical work. Firefighting and certain policing roles are examples where courts have accepted age-related arguments, though even these are scrutinized carefully.
Recognized exceptions to the prohibition
Safety-critical occupations
Where continued employment beyond a certain age poses a demonstrable and documented risk to health or safety, a mandatory retirement policy may be justified as a BFOR.
Occupational Health and Safety Act
In limited circumstances, the Occupational Health and Safety Act may support age-based restrictions where a genuine safety risk can be established and individual accommodation is not feasible.
Collective agreements
Unionized workplaces may have collective agreement provisions touching on retirement, but these provisions must still comply with the Ontario Human Rights Code to be enforceable.
Was a retirement policy applied to you without proper legal justification?
Most mandatory retirement policies in Ontario do not meet the legal standard required to override human rights protections. Our team can assess whether what happened to you was lawful.
Get Legal Advice Or call us: 1-800-771-7882Voluntary retirement and retirement discussions
Discussions about retirement plans are permitted and are a normal part of workforce planning. Offering voluntary retirement incentives is also lawful. What is not permitted is pressure, coercion, or any suggestion that a person should retire simply because of their age. The line between a legitimate conversation and age-based pressure can be narrow, and context matters significantly.
Where retirement discussions cross into age-based pressure, they may form the basis of a human rights complaint or a wrongful dismissal claim, depending on how the employment relationship ends.
Legal consequences of unlawful mandatory retirement
Human rights complaint
A complaint may be filed with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. Remedies can include compensation for lost income, damages for injury to dignity, and orders requiring policy changes.
Wrongful dismissal claim
Where retirement is effectively forced, it may constitute a dismissal without proper notice or compensation, giving rise to a wrongful dismissal claim through the courts.
Constructive dismissal
Where age-based pressure makes continued employment intolerable, it may support a constructive dismissal claim even where formal retirement was not explicitly demanded.
Frequently asked questions about mandatory retirement in Ontario
Is mandatory retirement legal in Ontario?
In most cases, no. Since Ontario removed the age 65 cap from the Ontario Human Rights Code in 2006, mandatory retirement has been presumptively prohibited. It can only be justified where a bona fide occupational requirement can be established, which is a high legal threshold met only in limited circumstances.
At what age can you be forced to retire in Ontario?
There is no mandatory retirement age in Ontario for most occupations. Age-based retirement policies are generally unlawful under the Ontario Human Rights Code unless the employer can demonstrate that the policy meets the strict bona fide occupational requirement test.
What is a bona fide occupational requirement in the context of retirement?
A BFOR is a legal justification for an otherwise discriminatory policy. To qualify, the policy must be rationally connected to job performance, adopted in good faith, and reasonably necessary to achieve a legitimate purpose that cannot be accommodated without undue hardship. In practice, very few retirement policies meet this standard.
What can be done if a mandatory retirement policy is applied unlawfully?
An application may be filed with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario within one year of the discriminatory act. Depending on how the employment ended, a wrongful dismissal claim through the courts may also be available. Both types of claims can be pursued, and legal advice should be sought as early as possible.
Does a collective agreement override human rights protections on retirement?
No. Collective agreement provisions related to retirement must still comply with the Ontario Human Rights Code. A collective agreement cannot contract out of human rights protections. Where a retirement provision in a collective agreement conflicts with the Code, the Code prevails.
Speak with an Ontario human rights lawyer
If you have questions about mandatory retirement, age-based workplace policies, or whether a retirement policy applied to you was lawful, our team can help. We advise on human rights compliance, wrongful dismissal, and HRTO proceedings across Ontario. Contact us for a confidential consultation.
Call us at 1-800-771-7882 or fill out the form below and we will be in touch.