Subscribe to our newsletters
Retirement Age in British Columbia Explained
In British Columbia, retirement is no longer tied to reaching a particular age. Human rights law, employment standards, and common law have fundamentally changed how retirement must be handled in the workplace.
Today, most BC employees have the right to continue working regardless of age. Employers that rely on outdated assumptions about retirement risk exposure to human rights complaints, wrongful dismissal claims, and significant damages.
This article explains how retirement is treated under British Columbia law, highlights leading cases, and outlines practical guidance for both employers and employees.
📍 Not in BC?
If you’re an employee or employer in Ontario, the law works differently. See our Ontario-specific article about retirement age.
Is There a Mandatory Retirement Age in British Columbia?
No. Mandatory retirement is generally prohibited in British Columbia.
Human Rights Code
The Human Rights Code, RSBC 1996, c 210, prohibits discrimination in employment based on age, including discrimination related to:
- Hiring and promotion
- Terms and conditions of employment
- Discipline
- Termination
- Forced or pressured retirement
Any policy or practice that requires employees to retire at a specific age (such as 65) is prima facie discriminatory, unless the employer can meet a very high legal threshold.
💡 Key Principle
There is no default retirement age in British Columbia. Age alone is never a lawful reason to end employment.
Key Authority: Forced Retirement and Employment Status
In McCormick v. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, 2014 SCC 39, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that forced retirement can violate human rights protections where the individual is truly an employee under BC law.
The decision is particularly important because it confirms that labels, partnership structures, or internal policies do not override the substance of the working relationship.
Can an Employer Suggest or Pressure an Employee to Retire?
In most situations, no.
What Counts as Retirement Pressure
The BC Human Rights Tribunal has repeatedly held that pressure does not need to be explicit.
It may include:
- Repeated questions about retirement plans
- Comments about age, stamina, or “slowing down.”
- Linking continued employment to succession planning
- Suggesting retirement as an alternative to performance management
Tribunal Guidance
In Nelson v. Goodberry Restaurant Group Ltd., 2021 BCHRT 137, the Tribunal found age discrimination where an older employee was treated as expendable based on age-based assumptions rather than objective performance concerns.
⚠️ Legal Risk
An employer does not need to order retirement. Persistent suggestions or assumptions may be enough to establish discrimination.
As Christopher Achkar, employment lawyer and founder of Achkar Law, explains:
“Understanding retirement age rules in B.C. is crucial for both employers planning workforce transitions and employees considering their next chapter.
Consulting with an employment lawyer ensures you make informed decisions that protect your rights and obligations.”
Is There an Age When Pension Benefits Must Start?
Canada Pension Plan (CPP)
Under federal law:
- CPP can begin as early as age 60 (reduced benefits)
- Standard benefits begin at age 65
- Benefits increase if deferred up to age 70
CPP eligibility does not require retirement.
Employer Pension Plans
Workplace pension plans may define a “normal retirement age” for benefit calculations, but:
- Employees may continue working beyond that age
- Pension eligibility does not justify termination
- Ending employment because someone can access a pension may breach the Human Rights Code
💡 Common Misconception
Pension eligibility does not equal an obligation to retire.
Can Employees Be Terminated After a Certain Age?
No. Age alone is never a lawful ground for termination in BC.
Employment Standards Act
The Employment Standards Act, RSBC 1996, c 113, does not set any age limit on:
- Notice of termination
- Pay in lieu of notice
- Other statutory entitlements
Older employees are entitled to the same ESA protections as any other employee.
Common Law Considerations
BC courts often recognize that older employees may face greater barriers to re-employment.
As a result, age can increase reasonable notice entitlements in wrongful dismissal claims.
Terminating someone because they are “close to retirement” significantly increases legal risk.
⚠️ High-Risk Decision
Age-based termination can trigger both wrongful dismissal damages and human rights compensation.
Workplace Benefits and Older Employees
Age Limits in Benefit Plans
Some benefit plans may reduce or end coverage at certain ages, but only if:
- The plan complies with human rights legislation, and
- The limitation is supported by legitimate actuarial or insurance evidence
- Age-based benefit distinctions are closely scrutinized and must be objectively justified.
Safety and Workers’ Compensation
Under the Workers Compensation Act, RSBC 2019, c 1, and WorkSafeBC policies, age does not reduce employer obligations.
Employers must ensure:
- Equal access to safety training
- Appropriate accommodation
- No exclusion from modified duties based on age
Foundational Case: BFOR Analysis
In BCGSEU v. British Columbia (Meiorin), [1999] 3 SCR 3, the Supreme Court of Canada (in a BC case) established the bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) test.
This governs when age-based standards may ever be justified in BC workplaces.
Retirement Planning: Practical Guidance
For BC Employers
- Focus on performance, not age
- Avoid retirement assumptions or informal pressure
- Use neutral succession planning
- Train managers on age discrimination risks
- Review benefit plans for Human Rights Code compliance
For Employees
- You are generally entitled to work past age 65
- Document retirement-related comments or pressure
- Seek advice before accepting retirement packages
- Do not assume retirement is mandatory
How an Employment Lawyer Can Help
Retirement-related disputes often involve overlapping legal issues, including:
- Human rights complaints
- Wrongful dismissal claims
- Pension and benefit compliance
- Workplace accommodation
A BC employment lawyer can assist with:
- Reviewing retirement and succession policies
- Advising on lawful retirement discussions
- Handling BC Human Rights Tribunal proceedings
- Negotiating retirement or exit arrangements
- Representing parties before BC courts
Final Takeaway
British Columbia law does not permit mandatory retirement based on age alone. Employers must manage retirement discussions carefully and lawfully, and employees should know that age does not limit their right to continue working.
Early legal advice can help prevent misunderstandings, reduce risk, and avoid disputes before they escalate into formal claims.
Need Guidance on Retirement or Age-Related Employment Issues in BC?
Retirement decisions and age-related workplace issues carry significant legal risk in British Columbia. A misstep, even an informal comment or outdated policy- can lead to human rights complaints, wrongful dismissal claims, or costly disputes.
Whether you are:
- An employer reviewing retirement practices, succession planning, or benefit policies, or
- An employee facing retirement pressure, benefit changes, or termination related to age
- getting legal advice early can help clarify your rights and obligations before problems escalate.
Our employment lawyers advise both employers and employees across British Columbia on age discrimination, retirement planning, workplace policies, and dispute resolution.
Contact us to discuss your situation and take informed, legally sound next steps.
The article in this client update provides general information and should not be relied on as legal advice or opinion. This publication is copyrighted by Achkar Law Professional Corporation and may not be photocopied or reproduced in any form, in whole or in part, without the express permission of Achkar Law Professional Corporation. ©